We use a standardized comprehensive community monitoring survey method, the CRANE Protocol, that quantifies fishes, invertebrates, algae, and habitat characteristics within multiple depth zones at each site. In early 2020, we surveyed each module footprint using the CRANE protocol and searched for any presence of Caulerpa spp. or eelgrass (Zostera spp.).
From these CRANE surveys we are able to quantify:
- Size structure, density, and species composition of fish, macroalgae, and invertebrate assemblages
- Biotic and abiotic benthic cover
- Substrate type and relief
- Size structure of select commercially and/or ecologically important invertebrates
In order to further our understanding of how reef shape, size, structure, and relief affect the fish, invertebrate, and macroalgal communities, an additional 25 isolated reefs along and adjacent to Palos Verdes Peninsula were surveyed using the CRANE protocol. These reefs included six natural reefs, 10 manmade reefs built with quarry rock, three shipwrecks, three sites with scattered debris, two sites with quarry rock resting on discharge pipes, and one site with engineered shelters. In addition to typical survey techniques, total reef height was also measured by recording depth at the bottom and top of the reef.
We also conducted supplementary scuba surveys at 9 locations over several years to determine the sediment depth over rocky reef throughout this area in an effort to better characterize soft bottom habitat areas in the study area and determine proposed locations for the restoration reef blocks. Sites that were found to be primarily exposed rocky reef were excluded from successive surveys.
Reef Design Concept
Our goal in the reef design plan was to utilize limited resources and engineering criteria to develop a restoration reef plan that maximizes the biological benefits. These benefits include insights drawn from reefs at Palos Verdes and throughout the Southern California Bight and include species richness, diversity and biomass. Our research indicates that multiple factors including reef size, spacing, relief, rock size, heterogeneity, depth, sediment depth, location relative to kelp bed perimeter and flux all influence reef performance. We developed a secondary production model that specifically analyzes the production of fish biomass to evaluate reef performance. In this project, these factors were juxtaposed with the economic, physical and engineering constraints to develop the restoration plan.
Maximize heterogeneity in reef characteristics (e.g., relief, interstitial space, overall angle of outer reef surface) to increase biodiversity by increasing the availability of distinct micro-habitats within each block while being consistent with the size of natural reefs along Palos Verdes Peninsula.
- Interstitial void space was also considered in our construction criteria due to the role it plays in supporting the density and diversity of fishes in general, and because large void spaces create critical habitat for several fish and invertebrates including California spiny lobster.
- Stagger high relief piles within blocks and pile heights across adjacent piles within blocks.
- Place high relief piles at the ends of each block to buffer any potential sedimentation of the 1 m relief piles in the middle of each block.
- Size blocks similar to current natural reefs along Palos Verdes.
- Increase the amount of outer reef edge (the relationship between perimeter and area) by not making blocks too large.
With these design elements in mind, additional placement criteria were followed for positioning restoration reef blocks across the Bunker Point restoration area in the restoration reef design.
- Blocks do not overlap with persistent kelp canopy.
- Blocks are placed at 15-20 m seafloor depth.
- Vary the orientation of each block and each module.
- Mimic natural features (reef width and orientation to natural features).
- Blocks placed in a maximum of 1m sediment to limit long-term burial/sinking.
- Incorporate 10-20 m sand channels between modules within a block to permit space for sediments moving with longshore current and wave action to move around/through modules.
- Maintain connectivity with existing natural reefs.
- Maximize distance between blocks to increase independence of each block.
The overall approach is to balance scientific study design considerations with maximizing the potential for an effective restoration effort across the range of important species and overall kelp forest biodiversity. Major motivations included incorporating heterogeneity throughout the restoration reef design both within (e.g., varying module heights within blocks) and amongst (e.g., varying block orientation).
Final Design Plan
The restoration reef is designed as set of six “blocks”. Each block contains three modules (A, B, C). Each module consists of a 3 x 2 set of six “piles”. Blocks will be in two forms, either with a 3-m maximum module height (relief) or a 4-m maximum module height, with three replicate blocks per set, and three replicate sets of each height. This will permit a comparison of the two reef heights impact on fish biomass and production.
There is a 10 to 20 m wide sand channel between modules and at least 50 m of space between blocks. By separating the blocks and modules by the appropriate distances we can restore a greater amount of reef perimeter sand-rock ecotone habitat and we can increase the independence of replicate reef blocks.